PSF-G1 » History » Version 3

Stephen Kent, 07/23/2012 10:28 AM

1 1 Stephen Kent
h1. PSF-G1
2 1 Stephen Kent
3 3 Stephen Kent
Telescope alignment errors / aberrations inferred from field dependence of moments of PSF on science array agree with those inferred from donut data, to within ??? waves of wavefront error.  NOTE: the PSF is bandpass-dependent.  This test should be done for r, i filters.  g and z may be more problematic (g band PSF is not very good towards the edge of the focal plane; z band affected by CCD transparency).
4 1 Stephen Kent
5 1 Stephen Kent
h2. Prerequisites
6 1 Stephen Kent
7 2 Stephen Kent
Static LUT for alignment has been installed and is being applied.  F/A donuts are being analyzed, but alignment tweaks need not yet be implemented.  Results of F/A analysis are stored in database or equivalent.  Focus loop is implemented and working.  (One MIGHT be able to do this test with open-loop focus adjustments, but not sure.)
8 2 Stephen Kent
9 1 Stephen Kent
h2. Procedure
10 2 Stephen Kent
11 3 Stephen Kent
This test can be performed using science data alone.  Science data in r and/or i bands must be taken in good seeing (FWHM < 1.2" ???).  One computes moments of stars on all science CCDs and uses the patterns to derive a misalignment (including defocus).  The numbers are compared with those derived from F/A donuts.
12 2 Stephen Kent
13 1 Stephen Kent
h2. Verdict
14 1 Stephen Kent
15 2 Stephen Kent
The numbers agree at the same level that BCAM and donut data should agree (translation within 200 microns; tilts and defocus to some equivalent values).
16 2 Stephen Kent
17 1 Stephen Kent
h2. Consequences
18 2 Stephen Kent
19 2 Stephen Kent
This test is intended to determine what is possible using the pattern of PSF shapes.  It is possible that one cannot derive a non-degenerate solution.