Fringing » History » Version 13

Paul Martini, 01/08/2013 06:46 AM

1 1 Paul Martini
h1. Fringing
2 1 Paul Martini
3 5 Paul Martini
This page contains analysis for [[Cal-R5]] and Cal-G6.
4 4 Paul Martini
5 12 Paul Martini
h2. TAMU Presentation on Fringing
6 12 Paul Martini
7 12 Paul Martini
Here are the main results from my presentation at the TAMU meeting:
8 12 Paul Martini
9 12 Paul Martini
* Fringing amplitude is 0.1-0.2% of the sky level in z, 0.3-0.5% in Y, the spatial scale is 1" to 60"
10 12 Paul Martini
* Fringe amplitude appears strongest at the center of the FOV
11 13 Paul Martini
* Fringe frames exhibit A/B offsets and these offsets appear more prominent in CCDs that exhibit more significant nonlinearities (see also the [[AB_ratio_variation]] wiki page)
12 12 Paul Martini
* Fringe correction appears stable, and even quite similar between z and Y.
13 12 Paul Martini
14 12 Paul Martini
The slides are available as "docdb#6830":
15 12 Paul Martini
16 12 Paul Martini
-- Paul Martini, 8 Jan 2013
17 12 Paul Martini
18 6 Paul Martini
h2. z-band fringing and the SN data
19 6 Paul Martini
20 8 Paul Martini
The typical peak-to-valley amplitude of the z-band fringing is about 0.1% and the largest variations are about 0.2%. These correspond to about 5-10 DN variations in a sky level of about 5000 DN in the 330s z-band images obtained for the SN deep fields. The fringe pattern is not readily apparent in the individual z-band images without smoothing, as the rms = 30 DN in these data. The fringe pattern is more obvious once the 11 330s z-band exposures have been combined, as the combined images should have a noise amplitude comparable to the amplitude of the fringe pattern.
21 6 Paul Martini
22 8 Paul Martini
I created a fringe frame from 10 regular survey (90s) z-band observations from 20121124 for CCD35, scaled it to match the fringe amplitude in the longer (330s) SN observations (of C3 obtained 20121202), and created stacked versions of the data for this CCD with and without the fringe correction. The uncorrected (left) and corrected (middle) images are shown in the two panels below. The third panel contains a smoothed version of the fringe correction frame. 
23 6 Paul Martini
24 7 Paul Martini
25 7 Paul Martini
26 6 Paul Martini
Because the fringe pattern is still comparable to the noise level, I also smoothed both stacked images with a 3-pixel Gaussian to make the fringe pattern more obvious. This is shown below. 
27 1 Paul Martini
28 1 Paul Martini
29 8 Paul Martini
30 8 Paul Martini
Note that the fringe-corrected data shown in the middle panel exhibits a large-scale gradient. This may be an artifact of using fringe 
31 8 Paul Martini
correction files generated on a different night. In any case, the feature is on the scale of the entire array and should be removed with background subtraction. 
32 6 Paul Martini
33 9 Paul Martini
Note also that the fringe correction frame is not perfect. There are several residual features (e.g. a saturated star 'footprint' in the upper left corner) that should disappear with either better masking or a larger input sample for construction of the fringe frame. 
34 9 Paul Martini
35 6 Paul Martini
-- Paul Martini, 5 December 2012
36 6 Paul Martini
37 6 Paul Martini
h2. Fringe pattern on CCD N4 in Y band
38 1 Paul Martini
39 11 Paul Martini
The typical peak-to-valley amplitude of the Y-band fringing is about 0.3% and the largest variations are about 0.5%. These correspond to about 3-5 DN variations in a sky level of about 900 DN in 50s Y-band images. 
40 10 Paul Martini
41 2 Paul Martini
A number of Y-band images were obtained under OBSTAC control during the bright time at the end of the SV period. I created fringe correction frames from observations on two separate nights to evaluate if the fringe pattern remains constant from night to night. The two datasets I evaluated are from 20121122 (9 observations of MS1a starting with 154495) and 20121124 (9 observations of RXT 2248.7-4431 starting with 155251). 
42 1 Paul Martini
43 1 Paul Martini
I started with the data processed through firstcut by DESDM for CCD N4. I created object masks and then combined the frames to create fringe frames for each night. The image below shows these two fringe frames, along with the difference of the two. The difference image shows no residual fringe pattern and implies the fringe pattern is quite stable, at least under photometric conditions. The grayscale stretch is +/- 2x the rms in the difference image. 
44 5 Paul Martini
45 5 Paul Martini
These results also suggest that 9 Y-band images are sufficient to produce an adequate fringe correction frame in most circumstances.
46 1 Paul Martini
47 1 Paul Martini
48 3 Paul Martini
49 3 Paul Martini
-- Paul Martini, 2 December 2012