Feature #16670
UPS to deal properly with SetupRequired inside a conditrional
Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Target version:
-
Start date:
05/25/2017
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Experiment:
-
Co-Assignees:
Description
Hi,
We'd like to require a dependency from inside a conditional in a UPS table file. We've wanted this for some time, but made do with SetupOptional, which is unsatisfactory but manageable. I think we even raised the issue with you verbally, but upon checking it never made it into a feature request.